Talk:Classic book
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Classic book article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 2 months ![]() |
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | A fact from Classic book appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 21 June 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | On 7 November 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved to Classical literature. The result of the discussion was not moved. |
That opening sentence...
[edit]The title of the topic is "Classic book," yet the first sentence of the article seems to define the word classic by itself by saying "A classic is a book accepted as being exemplary or particularly noteworthy." Technically, the word classic could be applied to any sort of art form, like literature or film. Shouldn't the opening sentence be, "A classic book is on that is accepted as being exemplary or particularly noteworthy"? Prileymovieguy84 (talk) 03:49, 25 March 2025 (UTC)
Globalization needed
[edit]Right now this just rehashes Western canon, with next to no mention of non-Western classic works. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 01:09, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Categories:
- B-Class level-5 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-5 vital articles in Arts
- B-Class vital articles in Arts
- B-Class history articles
- Low-importance history articles
- WikiProject History articles
- B-Class Book articles
- WikiProject Books articles
- B-Class novel articles
- High-importance novel articles
- WikiProject Novels articles
- B-Class Literature articles
- Top-importance Literature articles
- Wikipedia Did you know articles